| ||||
| FEBRUARY | Issue No.3 | 2 0 0 4 | ||
|
Brought to you by The Applications Team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. | |
| Contact Info | |
|
Technical Questions: | |
|
Geoffrey C. Bell
| |
|
Newsletter Feedback: | |
|
Evan Mills
|
|
| Subscribe | |
| Unsubscribe | |
| The Berkeley Hood | |
| Applications Team | |
| LBNL | |
| EETD | |
|
|
We’ve Expanded: 6-foot Berkeley Hoods Come of Age. | |
| We
have developed a new generation of Berkeley Hoods with 6-foot (nominal)
openings. The prototype hood has successfully passed tracer-gas
containment tests (see below).
| |
|
Pushing the
Envelope: | |
| We have completed an initial study of the performance “envelope” of the push-pull Berkeley Hood, to better understand its ability to maintain containment across a range of operating conditions. Over 100 test runs were performed on a four-foot hood with different amounts of supply airflow. The results were very favorable, with no failures in normal operating modes. Among the specific findings: | |
| |
|
| |
|
Meeting
the Standard | |
|
Industry leaders are recognizing the limitations of face velocity as an indicator of hood containment and, thus, safety. ANSI, who promulgated the face velocity standard for many years, now strongly recommends against its sole use as a performance test. Their newly adopted Laboratory Ventilation standard Z9.5-2003 (developed with the American Industrial Hygiene Association, AIHA) requires using the more meaningful tracer-gas testing, which verifies containment. Experts have found that many hoods pass a face velocity test but fail these more robust containment tests. Worker safety is not well served by relying on face velocity measurements as the sole performance indicator. LBNL
requested an interpretation of the new standard in the context of the
push-pull Berkeley Hood. Following
are excerpts from ANSI/AIHA’s interpretation: | |
|
"Prior to the 1980s, face
velocity and visual smoke observations were used as the major indicators
of hood performance. Recent
studies have indicated that face velocity alone may not be predictive of
adequate hood performance.” "[I]t seems that your specific design of hood may not lend itself well to evaluation solely by face velocity tests.” “Clearly, your design is not typical, and if effective containment can be demonstrated at a lower face velocity than that provided in the guidance, it would appear that this particular hood was in conformance with this aspect of ANSI/AIHA Z9.5-2003.” “The
current document [ANSI/AIHA Z9.5] indicates that containment, and not
face velocity is the primary performance criteria.” | |
|
New Projects Underway | |
|
The Fume Hood development team began a major set of new activities under sponsorship of the California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program. This work will bring the Berkeley Hood closer to commercialization by conducting several demonstrations of the 6-foot hood and performing containment tests per ASHRAE 110-1995. The project will also include interacting with CAL-OSHA, which must provide variances for the proposed industrial demonstrations. Side-by-side tests with a conventional hood will also be performed and reported. The test methods and protocol will be developed in concert with industry experts and will include standard as well as non-standard tests (e.g. with operator motion). | |
|
Technology
Transfer Award | |
|
On November 21, 2003, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Director Charles Shank presented 16 Lab employees with Technology
Transfer Awards. The honor recognizes inventors and their technologies
that bring benefit to society. This year’s list includes the Berkeley
Hood. For more information, see: http://www.lbl.gov/today/2003/Nov/24-Mon/TTD-awards.html | |